top of page

Blog Posts

  • Save Perth Hills Inc

Time is ticking on $atterley's LAST CHANCE to STOP and Surrender its dangerous and destructive North $toneville plan.

Tomorrow, (Friday 8 March) Save Perth Hills is back in the State Tribunal (SAT), where $atterley and its Anglican Diocese business partners, including Sam '(Rio') Walsh and Archbishop Kay Goldsworthy, can choose to DITCH their DOOMED Disaster Plan, or face a MASSIVE Corporate FAIL in a very PUBLIC Appeal.

A 1990s URBAN TINDERBOX TOWNSITE has no place in the 21st Century's Climate Change Emergency. Additionally - 'North $TONEVILLE now faces URBAN ISOLATION - and reduced viability ($$$), because 730 homes, planned over the road at 'North PARKERVILLE', have been abandoned in favour of just 67, five-acre-and-larger lots. Council will consider that plan on Tuesday - which Shire officers' say 'supports the shift away from a more urban town site'. ARE YOU LISTENING, $ATTERLEY?

If $atterley chooses to take the road to reputational ruin (via an appeal), we'll need $$$ for legal advice... So please donate whatever you can for a NEW SPH sticker at Rotary Club of Mundaring Twilight Markets Sculpture Park 4-8pm on Saturday (March 9) and help Save Perth Hills!

17 views0 comments
  • Save Perth Hills Inc

Without warning, or reason, the significantly downsized “North Parkerville” plan, (NOT North $toneville), has been pulled, by the Shire, from tomorrow’s Council meeting.

So hold those deputations folks!

This is an inexplicable withdrawal, subject to an indefinite delay, of a significant Community issue that holds long-term planning consequences for the Hills. The Community deserves an urgent explanation from the Shire.

‘North Parkerville’ was originally 730 URBAN lots. The developer downsized it to 67 Rural Residential (RR) lots of 5 acres and larger, with firefighting-tanks on each site. It was to be discussed at Council tomorrow night.

($atterley and the Anglican Church stubbornly refuse to consider an RR option for the 33-year-REJECTED URBAN North $toneville townsite – across the road.)

But WHY the withdrawal?

WHAT’s the ‘later date’?

AND – WHY was the Item ON the Council’s Agenda, minus any Planning Officers’ reports?

Ratepayers pay the Shire to work on our behalf.

We require a REASON for the withdrawal - to demonstrate Shire TRANSPARENCY.

We require a new DATE to demonstrate Shire ACCOUNTABILITY.

Our Community is asking - What’s going on?

32 views0 comments
  • Save Perth Hills Inc

$atterley loves to drag these things out. Even after the umpire calls time over and over and over…Read about it on WAToday Satterley Stoneville development: Tribunal scolds property group over unrelenting Perth Hills estate row (

The more time that passes, the more out-dated his urban plan in a fire prone area becomes. Meanwhile the cost on the WA tax payer continues to climb.

As for the Perth Hills community - our resolve only strengthens with each extension and extra chance this developer has been given. You’d think $atterley and the Anglican Church would have gotten the message by now that their plan is unsafe and undefendable…

Stay tuned for the next steps!

45 views0 comments
bottom of page