top of page

Blog Posts

Search
  • Save Perth Hills Inc

I obtained leave from Parliament to attend the Mundaring Shire Council meeting last night for the debate and Council recommendation to the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) regarding the North Stoneville Structure Plan 34. Over 1000 people opposed to the structure plan attend the meeting that had to be held in the Mundaring Arena. The Council unanimously recommended that the WAPC not approve SP34 on a number of significant planning grounds and in the knowledge that the nature and scale of the development is not appropriate. It is to be hoped that the WAPC, which is the decision making body, heeds the view of the Council and the community it represents. The Anglican Church and the Anglican Trustees should seriously reconsider their position on this matter. My view is that the processes that have brought the owner of the land and the developer to this position point to how outdated and outmoded the statutory planning processes are. Urgent change is needed.

8 views0 comments
  • Save Perth Hills Inc

In what was the biggest council meeting the Mundaring Shire has ever hosted, 1,100 Mundaring Shire residents turned up last night, to hear their Councillors deliver a unanimous NO vote to plans by the Anglican Diocese of Perth and developer Satterley, for a controversial townsite of 4,000 people in North Stoneville.

The Council transferred the meeting from Council Chambers to the Mundaring Sports Arena in anticipation of huge numbers. Roads around the Arena, including Great Eastern Highway, were blocked by hundreds of cars, as more than one thousand residents and ratepayers made their way to the meeting.

The Save Perth Hills action group said the Councillors’ NO vote was a resounding win for the community and signalled the Councillors had listened and responded to the will of the people. “We congratulate our local community for their unprecedented 1,000 public submissions lodged with the Shire, and for their unwavering commitment and desire to protect and preserve Perth Hills’ culture, landscape and environment for future generations,” Save Perth Hills Chair, Paige McNeil, said.

“We won a big battle last night – but there’s still a long way to go,” she said

Land developer Satterley wants to build 1,450 suburban style homes, some blocks as small as 300 square metres, on 555 hectares of isolated land, owned by the Anglican Diocese of Perth. The area, eight kilometres from the nearest community services in Mundaring, is 155 hectares bigger than Kings Park, and surrounded by an Extreme Fire Zone.

Local residents, aged 8 to 80, lined up last night to deliver deputations to the Councillors outlining concerns about the scale and inappropriateness of the proposal, the lack of safe bushfire management and emergency escape routes, the widespread environmental destruction, and risks of an unproven ‘test case’ sewerage plant.

Many deputations focussed on the additional financial burden the development would bring existing ratepayers, while the private landowner, the Anglican Diocese, would reap tax-free commercial gains from land it was originally gifted, more than 100 years ago.

The unanimous Council decision, to refuse Satterley’s North Stoneville Structure Plan 34, will now move to the Western Australian Planning Commission for ultimate decision making. This could take up to 4 months or longer.

“Concerns over proposed development at North Stoneville have been high on our community’s radar for more than 20 long years,” Paige said. “Every time, the development plans have been rejected - and every time, another new proposal in thrust on the community. Last night our Council drew a line in the sand and said enough is enough.”


“In addition to the Shire Officers’ report, recommending that the plan be rejected on traffic safety issues, our Councillors added many more motions stating the area was unsuitable for large scale urbanisation, the fire risks were too high, environmental losses would be too great and the development would not be serviced by public transport.”

Specifically, Council corrected the Shire Officers’ statement that the plan was ‘generally’ compliant to ‘partly’ compliant given the plan conflicts with the WA Planning Commission’s own Bushfire mitigation policy 3.7: “Avoid any increase in the threat of bushfire to people, property and infrastructure. The preservation of life and the management of bushfire impact are paramount.”

Councillors stated that the application process had cost ratepayers in order of $50,000 which cannot be recouped by the landowner or Satterley.

Satterley accused the Shire of not providing the necessary road upgrades to support the development with Cr. Brennan stating that ratepayer funds should not be used to pay for road upgrades for a private development so strongly opposed by the community.

Save Perth Hills’ Chair, Paige McNeil, called on the Anglican Diocese of Perth not to waste anymore taxpayers’ money and to withdraw the application from the WAPC.

“Structure Plan 34 is dangerous, destructive and a planning disaster. This land should have never been zoned ‘urban’ in the first place. A mistake was made, and it will take courage to fix this mistake.

“We are heartened that the Shire of Mundaring Councillors demonstrated diligence, prudence and responsible decision making which focussed on the inappropriate scale of the development.”



PO Box 33 Stoneville WA 6081

saveperthhillsinc@gmail.com

16 views0 comments
  • Save Perth Hills Inc

Shire of Mundaring Council last night voted unanimously to recommend refusal of the proposed North Stoneville Townsite Structure Plan 34 (SP34) at a Special Council Meeting.

The meeting, held at Mundaring Arena, was attended by more than 1000 community members.

Council was required to consider 957 public submissions, the Shire's planning assessment and to make a recommendation about the proposal to the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC).

The Shire's report to Council included a Traffic Impact Assessment. It identified that traffic generated by the proposed development would exacerbate road network capacity constraints and would therefore compromise public safety.

A motion to recommend refusal of SP34 included reasons such as traffic management, bushfire risks, environmental damage and a lack of public transport in the proposed area.

Shire President Cr John Daw said the proposal would now be considered by the WAPC, the authority responsible for determining the outcome of the development.

"Council trusts that the planning commission will seriously consider our recommendation and make a decision in the best interests of our community," he said.

"Of particular concern and a linchpin reason for refusal is the inability of the traffic network to cope with such a large volume increase in traffic which would compromise community and bushfire safety."

Cr Daw thanked everyone who participated in the Special Council meeting, especially the younger member of the community who contributed.

"I would also like to acknowledge the Chief Executive Officer Jonathan Throssell and the planning officers for their professional diligence in providing advice to Council, community members and the applicant."

33 views0 comments
bottom of page